0.04/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.04/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 1440 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 180 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jul 4 08:17:23 EDT 2024 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.19/0.47 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.19/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.evtcrFm9OO/E---3.1_10939.p 0.19/0.50 # Version: 3.2.0-ho 0.19/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLMNHSA. 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.19/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting new_ho_7 with 180s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting lpo8_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting lpo9_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # new_ho_10 with pid 11021 completed with status 0 0.19/0.50 # Result found by new_ho_10 0.19/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLMNHSA. 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.19/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.19/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied 0.19/0.50 # Search class: HGUSS-FFSF33-SHSFMSNN 0.19/0.50 # partial match(3): HGUSM-FFSF32-SHSFMSBN 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.19/0.50 # Starting sh2 with 487s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 91s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting lpo1_def_fix with 82s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 82s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 82s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # ehoh_best8_lambda with pid 11031 completed with status 0 0.19/0.50 # Result found by ehoh_best8_lambda 0.19/0.50 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLMNHSA. 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 0.19/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 900s (5) cores 0.19/0.50 # No SInE strategy applied 0.19/0.50 # Search class: HGUSS-FFSF33-SHSFMSNN 0.19/0.50 # partial match(3): HGUSM-FFSF32-SHSFMSBN 0.19/0.50 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 900 seconds (900 total) 0.19/0.50 # Starting sh2 with 487s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting new_ho_10 with 91s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting lpo1_def_fix with 82s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 82s (1) cores 0.19/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.19/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.19/0.50 0.19/0.50 # Proof found! 0.19/0.50 # SZS status Theorem 0.19/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_22, type, in: $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_24, type, func: $i > $i > $i > $o). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_25, type, ap: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_26, type, app: $o). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_27, type, lam: $i > $i > ($i > $i) > $i). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_28, type, lamp: $o). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_29, type, funcext: $o). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_30, type, beta1: $o). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_31, type, esk1_3: $i > $i > ($i > $i) > $i). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_32, type, esk2_4: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_33, type, esk3_3: $i > $i > ($i > $i) > $i). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_34, type, esk4_0: $i). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_35, type, esk5_0: $i). 0.19/0.50 thf(decl_36, type, esk6_0: $i). 0.19/0.50 thf(lamp, axiom, ((lamp)<=>![X1:$i, X2:$i, X7:$i > $i]:((![X4:$i]:(((in @ X4 @ X1)=>(in @ (X7 @ X4) @ X2)))=>(func @ X1 @ X2 @ (lam @ X1 @ X2 @ (^[X4:$i]:(X7 @ X4))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.evtcrFm9OO/E---3.1_10939.p', lamp)). 0.19/0.50 thf(beta1, axiom, ((beta1)<=>![X1:$i, X2:$i, X9:$i > $i]:((![X4:$i]:(((in @ X4 @ X1)=>(in @ (X9 @ X4) @ X2)))=>![X4:$i]:(((in @ X4 @ X1)=>((ap @ X1 @ X2 @ (lam @ X1 @ X2 @ (^[X6:$i]:(X9 @ X6))) @ X4)=(X9 @ X4))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.evtcrFm9OO/E---3.1_10939.p', beta1)). 0.19/0.50 thf(eta1, conjecture, (((((beta1)=>![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:((((lam @ X1 @ X2 @ (^[X4:$i]:(ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4)))=(X3))<=(func @ X1 @ X2 @ X3))))<=(funcext))<=(lamp))<=(app)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.evtcrFm9OO/E---3.1_10939.p', eta1)). 0.19/0.50 thf(app, axiom, ((app)<=>![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:(((func @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)=>![X4:$i]:(((in @ X4 @ X1)=>(in @ (ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4) @ X2)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.evtcrFm9OO/E---3.1_10939.p', app)). 0.19/0.50 thf(funcext, axiom, ((funcext)<=>![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:(((func @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)=>![X8:$i]:(((func @ X1 @ X2 @ X8)=>(![X4:$i]:(((in @ X4 @ X1)=>((ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4)=(ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X8 @ X4))))=>((X3)=(X8)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.evtcrFm9OO/E---3.1_10939.p', funcext)). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_5, plain, ((lamp)<=>![X1:$i, X2:$i, X7:$i > $i]:((![X4:$i]:(((in @ X4 @ X1)=>(in @ (X7 @ X4) @ X2)))=>(func @ X1 @ X2 @ (lam @ X1 @ X2 @ (^[Z0/* 17 */:$i]:(X7 @ Z0))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[lamp])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_6, plain, ((beta1)<=>![X1:$i, X2:$i, X9:$i > $i]:((![X4:$i]:(((in @ X4 @ X1)=>(in @ (X9 @ X4) @ X2)))=>![X4:$i]:(((in @ X4 @ X1)=>((ap @ X1 @ X2 @ (lam @ X1 @ X2 @ (^[Z0/* 17 */:$i]:(X9 @ Z0))) @ X4)=(X9 @ X4))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[beta1])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ~((![X45:$i, X46:$i, X47:$i]:(((func @ X45 @ X46 @ X47)=>![X48:$i]:(((in @ X48 @ X45)=>(in @ (ap @ X45 @ X46 @ X47 @ X48) @ X46)))))=>(![X41:$i, X42:$i, X43:$i > $i]:((![X44:$i]:(((in @ X44 @ X41)=>(in @ (X43 @ X44) @ X42)))=>(func @ X41 @ X42 @ (lam @ X41 @ X42 @ X43))))=>(![X36:$i, X37:$i, X38:$i]:(((func @ X36 @ X37 @ X38)=>![X39:$i]:(((func @ X36 @ X37 @ X39)=>(![X40:$i]:(((in @ X40 @ X36)=>((ap @ X36 @ X37 @ X38 @ X40)=(ap @ X36 @ X37 @ X39 @ X40))))=>((X38)=(X39)))))))=>(![X31:$i, X32:$i, X33:$i > $i]:((![X34:$i]:(((in @ X34 @ X31)=>(in @ (X33 @ X34) @ X32)))=>![X35:$i]:(((in @ X35 @ X31)=>((ap @ X31 @ X32 @ (lam @ X31 @ X32 @ X33) @ X35)=(X33 @ X35))))))=>![X1:$i, X2:$i, X3:$i]:(((func @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)=>((lam @ X1 @ X2 @ (ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X3))=(X3))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[eta1])]), app]), c_0_5]), funcext]), c_0_6])])])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X55:$i, X56:$i, X57:$i, X58:$i, X59:$i, X60:$i, X61:$i > $i, X63:$i, X64:$i, X65:$i, X66:$i, X68:$i, X69:$i, X70:$i > $i, X72:$i]:(((~(func @ X55 @ X56 @ X57)|(~(in @ X58 @ X55)|(in @ (ap @ X55 @ X56 @ X57 @ X58) @ X56)))&((((in @ (esk1_3 @ X59 @ X60 @ X61) @ X59)|(func @ X59 @ X60 @ (lam @ X59 @ X60 @ X61)))&(~(in @ (X61 @ (esk1_3 @ X59 @ X60 @ X61)) @ X60)|(func @ X59 @ X60 @ (lam @ X59 @ X60 @ X61))))&((((in @ (esk2_4 @ X63 @ X64 @ X65 @ X66) @ X63)|((X65)=(X66))|~(func @ X63 @ X64 @ X66)|~(func @ X63 @ X64 @ X65))&(((ap @ X63 @ X64 @ X65 @ (esk2_4 @ X63 @ X64 @ X65 @ X66))!=(ap @ X63 @ X64 @ X66 @ (esk2_4 @ X63 @ X64 @ X65 @ X66)))|((X65)=(X66))|~(func @ X63 @ X64 @ X66)|~(func @ X63 @ X64 @ X65)))&((((in @ (esk3_3 @ X68 @ X69 @ X70) @ X68)|(~(in @ X72 @ X68)|((ap @ X68 @ X69 @ (lam @ X68 @ X69 @ X70) @ X72)=(X70 @ X72))))&(~(in @ (X70 @ (esk3_3 @ X68 @ X69 @ X70)) @ X69)|(~(in @ X72 @ X68)|((ap @ X68 @ X69 @ (lam @ X68 @ X69 @ X70) @ X72)=(X70 @ X72)))))&((func @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)&((lam @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0))!=(esk6_0)))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])])])])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X4:$i, X3:$i, X1:$i]:(((in @ (ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4) @ X2)|~((func @ X1 @ X2 @ X3))|~((in @ X4 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, (func @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:(((in @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0 @ X1) @ esk5_0)|~((in @ X1 @ esk4_0)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X5:$i > $i]:(((in @ (esk1_3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5) @ X1)|(func @ X1 @ X2 @ (lam @ X1 @ X2 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X4:$i, X3:$i]:(((in @ (esk2_4 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4) @ X1)|((X3)=(X4))|~((func @ X1 @ X2 @ X4))|~((func @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X5:$i > $i, X2:$i]:(((func @ X1 @ X2 @ (lam @ X1 @ X2 @ X5))|~((in @ (X5 @ (esk1_3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5)) @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X5:$i > $i]:(((in @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0 @ (esk1_3 @ esk4_0 @ X1 @ X5)) @ esk5_0)|(func @ esk4_0 @ X1 @ (lam @ esk4_0 @ X1 @ X5)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i]:((((X1)=(esk6_0))|(in @ (esk2_4 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ X1 @ esk6_0) @ esk4_0)|~((func @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_10])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (func @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (lam @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ((lam @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0))!=(esk6_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$i > $i, X3:$i, X2:$i, X1:$i]:(((in @ (esk3_3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5) @ X1)|((ap @ X1 @ X2 @ (lam @ X1 @ X2 @ X5) @ X3)=(X5 @ X3))|~((in @ X3 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, (in @ (esk2_4 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (lam @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)) @ esk6_0) @ esk4_0), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17]), c_0_18])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X2:$i, X4:$i, X3:$i]:((((X3)=(X4))|((ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ (esk2_4 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4))!=(ap @ X1 @ X2 @ X4 @ (esk2_4 @ X1 @ X2 @ X3 @ X4)))|~((func @ X1 @ X2 @ X4))|~((func @ X1 @ X2 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X5:$i > $i]:((((ap @ esk4_0 @ X1 @ (lam @ esk4_0 @ X1 @ X5) @ (esk2_4 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (lam @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)) @ esk6_0))=(X5 @ (esk2_4 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (lam @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)) @ esk6_0)))|(in @ (esk3_3 @ esk4_0 @ X1 @ X5) @ esk4_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$i > $i, X3:$i, X2:$i, X1:$i]:((((ap @ X1 @ X2 @ (lam @ X1 @ X2 @ X5) @ X3)=(X5 @ X3))|~((in @ (X5 @ (esk3_3 @ X1 @ X2 @ X5)) @ X2))|~((in @ X3 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (in @ (esk3_3 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)) @ esk4_0), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22]), c_0_10]), c_0_17])]), c_0_18])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X5:$i > $i, X1:$i]:((((ap @ esk4_0 @ X1 @ (lam @ esk4_0 @ X1 @ X5) @ (esk2_4 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (lam @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)) @ esk6_0))=(X5 @ (esk2_4 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (lam @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)) @ esk6_0)))|~((in @ (X5 @ (esk3_3 @ esk4_0 @ X1 @ X5)) @ X1)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_20])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_26, negated_conjecture, (in @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0 @ (esk3_3 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0))) @ esk5_0), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_24])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_27, negated_conjecture, ((ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (lam @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)) @ (esk2_4 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (lam @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)) @ esk6_0))=(ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0 @ (esk2_4 @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (lam @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ (ap @ esk4_0 @ esk5_0 @ esk6_0)) @ esk6_0))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25, c_0_26])). 0.19/0.50 thf(c_0_28, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_27]), c_0_10]), c_0_17])]), c_0_18]), ['proof']). 0.19/0.50 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.19/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 15 0.19/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.19/0.50 # Initial clauses : 20 0.19/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 9 0.19/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 11 0.19/0.50 # Processed clauses : 46 0.19/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0 0.19/0.50 # ...subsumed : 0 0.19/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 46 0.19/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1 0.19/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.19/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0 0.19/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 2 0.19/0.50 # Generated clauses : 77 0.19/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 71 0.19/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.19/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.19/0.50 # Paramodulations : 72 0.19/0.50 # Factorizations : 0 0.19/0.50 # NegExts : 0 0.19/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 2 0.19/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.19/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 11 0.19/0.50 # ...of those cached : 4 0.19/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.19/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.19/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 32 0.19/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10 0.19/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1 0.19/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 1 0.19/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 20 0.19/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 45 0.19/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 111 0.19/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.19/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 14 0.19/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 33 0.19/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30 0.19/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0 0.19/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6 0.19/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.19/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 37 0.19/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 2 0.19/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.19/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0 0.19/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6137 0.19/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 616 0.19/0.50 0.19/0.50 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.19/0.50 # User time : 0.009 s 0.19/0.50 # System time : 0.004 s 0.19/0.50 # Total time : 0.013 s 0.19/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1960 pages 0.19/0.50 0.19/0.50 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.19/0.50 # User time : 0.044 s 0.19/0.50 # System time : 0.009 s 0.19/0.50 # Total time : 0.053 s 0.19/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages 0.19/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting 0.19/0.50 % E exiting 0.19/0.50 EOF